Because I think the Tea Party should stick to tax and spend issues, that means Im cool with re-defining marriage?
Pretty twisted logic.
Yet I have already explained that it is a fiscal issue and yet you continue to pursue attacking my posts without even addressing that. Your whole point is that you want to purge the Tea party of what you think are unworthy issues. You expect that the Tea party should accept some aspects of big government intruding on business and taxpayers. That is what is twisted logic.
It sure seems as if you accept it enough to not want it to be an issue within the Tea party. I guess having big government dictating to business through the threat of lawsuits and taking their hard earned money unless they conform and accept a certain perverted form of morality is an alright TAX for you to accept.
And you are not even to accept that the issue is being attacked by trying to deny the people a right to representation on the issue.
So by your twisted logic the TEA party should accept this form of taxation without representation and not fight against it.