[fwdude]

It's impossible to divorce "fiscal conservatism" with "social/moral conservatism" - they two sides of the same coin, if not really on a one-sided coin.

Allow homo-perversion unfettered reign in exchange for fiscal conservatism, and you will soon find that you have mandated perversion and no fiscal/economic conservatism.

Just look at mAssachusetts, for crying out loud!!!

[TheBigIf]

I agree 100%.

The TEA party is a call back to the battle that took place to form this nation and our Constitution.

For anyone to claim that only certain Constitutional issues are allowed to be represented within the TEA party movement is absurd.

You can not claim that we do not want big government in only fiscal areas alone. The TEA party is about all Constitutional issues and our representation as a People.

[allmendream]

No, it is not at all impossible to separate a movement that calls for lower taxes with one that calls for all sorts of other things not at all related to lower taxes.

The movement about taxes, evoking a famous tax protest in our nation's history, doesn't have to attempt to carry every issue you think should be tacked onto its back.

We can probably get most working Americans to agree that their taxes are too high. Start tacking on all sorts of social issues and less and less people agree, and you dilute the simple and clear message.

Apparently your pet cause is “homo-perversion”, and that has NOTHING to do with if taxes are too high or not.