No, Im not deciding anything. The Tea Party is not a social movement. I did not make that the case. It is self evident. You dont like that, so you call everyone who disagrees with you a Marxist.
I understand who goes to the rallies. I know social conservatives are there and they are welcome. But the movement is not about that.
You still cant show 1 example of a “social conservative 1st” person who started the movement, only some lame MSM “the people” crap. About as reliable as “some say.”
You are such a Marxist!
Childish shill!
So your point is that the TEA party movement is somehow neutral in regards to all social issues?
Sometimes they could support a social Marxist who claims to be fiscally conservative and then maybe they can support support social conservatists as well sometimes?
You want to claim that the TEA party is neutral on all social issues?
You are proving yourself to be a complete phony here at FR if you want to argue such a point.
As I have already pointed out many times but you have never addressed even once though you waste my time, social Marxism believes in the ‘Abolition of family’. It believes in using the Court to redistribute wealth and power in the market place. It seeks to deny the People our right to representation on issues. If you support having that type of social Marxism in the TEA party movement then you are a exposing yourself as someone who is here to undermine our rights and our country.