I agree that the TEA party was kick started by Santelli statements but that in no way shows that it is or should be limited the way that you would like it to be.
It is you who are a coward and is trying to force your own agenda upon the movement though. You want the TEA party movement to be softer and more appealing to Marxist liberal losers who want to force their cowardly peverted morality upon us all.
The TEA party started based upon Constitutional issues whereas they opposed takeovers and bailouts by the federal government to poison the free market. It started with an opposition to out of control government oppression of the people by disregarding their right to representation on these issues by claiming a crisis. The TEA party started with an opposition to a democrat party pushing radical agendas.
All of these issues are right in line with social conservative issues.
There is no way A coward like you who wants to be cozy with the perverts and fascists of the left-wing is going to change that. It is you who is trying to hijack a movement and not me.
Well, if Santelli started it, and it was based on spending, then that is what the group is about. Doesnt matter if you like it or not, that is the case. I can show proof where Santelli started this, you dont have anything to show it was started by someone else. The only person trying to inject their ideas into the Tea Party is you.
I dont want marxism in the tea party, because marxism is the opposite of free enterprise.
“I agree that the TEA party was kick started by Santelli statements but that in no way shows that it is or should be limited the way that you would like it to be.”
.
Exactly right! - You’ve got him in his corner now.
There is no such thing as a conservative that isn’t both socially and fiscally conservative, and that is what the movement is.
The “fiscals” are a shill wedge sent in to break the conservative movement and hand a victory to the degenerates.
.