You hypocritically insults me and other Constitutionalists FReeper FRiends when calling us by a derogatory name "Birthers" which we are far from. The B.C. is totally irrelevant to his NBC status which the lib media uses generously as well you do too, and you know it if you are honest with yourself???
Actually no. I didn't see it that way. I dealt with the Truthers in the Ron Paul forums, and believed this to be the same type of dynamic.
I really do not know what other name to use for a group of folks who think any of these three things. So if you have a club name, or REFUSE ANY name, just let me know and I will adjust accordingly.
But, in general there are those who believe one of more of the following:
1. BHO was NOT born in the USA.
2. He may have been born in the USA but by other legal means, his status still makes him ineligible for the presidency.
3. If we find proof of 1 or 2, then he will be NULL and VOID and all his deeds will be as if they never happened.
So tell me... do I have those 3 things close enough?
Because I reject all 3. And I especially reject #3. Even if #1 or #2 are proven, I do not believe the result will be an UNDOING, perhaps not even an ENDING of doing more. I believe some twist of legal proceedure will validate his standing, in so much that Abortion was validated and Homosexuality is about to be validated and Illegal Immigration is de facto validated.
Thus, I believe this is all a rabbit chase. A tilting at windmills. A red herring of our own doing.
I believe we should be focused on what precious few legal and legitimate venues to recourse still avail themselves before they are all lost.
I look forward to hearing a different opinion on this matter.
Respectfully submitted,