Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
However, I do thank you for bring up a fact based objection.

I didn't state a fact, I only posted excerpts from others opinion. Neither you or I know the facts about your dear leader's adoption, because like you are trying to muddying the water so has your dear leader in the W.H. been more effective than you to hide, sanitizing and bury the whole truth and nothing but the truth!!!

So IF Barry became an Indonesian citizen, and IF he lost his U.S. citizenship which also is very doubtful that he ever had (IF born in Kenya, which they claim over there) and still an "IF," and IF he then re-entered U.S. as an Indonesian citizen, you will still fight for him as being a NBC, right???

637 posted on 08/04/2010 9:33:01 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies ]


To: danamco

Anyone calling for other than a full disclosure of files and information, is fighting for Obama’s obfuscation of his record and status.


638 posted on 08/04/2010 9:34:49 AM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies ]

To: danamco
If Obama was born in the USA, then he could not lose his citizenship by living in Indonesia, nor could his parents make any decisions that would cost him his citizenship. Nothing they did would cost him citizenship, and re-entering the USA on an Indonesian passport would not cost him his US citizenship.

And the courts have frequently used native born and natural born as synonyms...so yes, Obama would still be eligible to be President.

As I pointed out previously, the Supreme Court has already said, "“Appellant, who was born in Germany, came to this country with her parents as a child and acquired derivative American citizenship. She lived abroad since graduation from college, became married to a German national, and, except for two visits back to this country, has lived in Germany for the past eight years. The State Department denied her a passport, certifying that she had lost her American citizenship under § 352(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which provides that a naturalized citizen, with exceptions not material here, loses citizenship by continuous residence for three years in the country of origin.... ...A native-born citizen is free to reside abroad indefinitely without suffering loss of citizenship. The discrimination aimed at naturalized citizens drastically limits their rights to live and work abroad in a way that other citizens may. It creates indeed a second-class citizenship. Living abroad, whether the citizen be naturalized or native born, is no badge of lack of allegiance, and in no way evidences a voluntary renunciation of nationality and allegiance. It may indeed be compelled by family, business, or other legitimate reasons."

643 posted on 08/04/2010 11:46:03 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson