Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

That letter is, indeed, printed in a proportional font, and an odd one at that. I don’t think that any standard typewriter in use at that time would have had that font.

My question is, if that letter is indeed faked, WHY? None of the info in it seems to be relevant to the child. Perhaps to establish the whereabouts of Ann on that date? Is there some significance to that?

Makes no sense. Unless we’re missing something — which is likely — seems like a lot of trouble for no good reason.


607 posted on 08/03/2010 11:46:41 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]


To: Jedidah
Here is a simple question from your simple question.

seems like a lot of trouble for no good reason.

They have now had YEARS and unlimited power and resources to bring to bear on these issues and documents. So, what if they only thing they have to gain, is to take the most motivated, dedicated, highest educated, most intelligent, most informed, hardest right wing conservatives and DISTRACT THEM.

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!!

Have you seriously considered that you are chasing a construct for the purpose of being in THAT chase and not able to FIGHT the battles which matter?

Conspiracies are fun. Everyone enjoys the thrill of a mystery.

So are you being played emotionally? Sucker punched the whole while? To wake up one day in a nation of Subjects and not Citizens?

609 posted on 08/03/2010 11:53:32 AM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Unless the GOP Senate ruins it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah

It appears that they redacted from the files the attachments that S. Ann Soetoro referred to in the letter. These were wage statements and tax returns. Lolo stood accused by Mr. O’Shea of filing as a non-resident in order to get tax benefits. I gather they would not re-admit him to the U.S. if he didn’t pay all his taxes. The letter was in response to that allegation and S. Ann (or somebody) wrote this letter to say that Lolo filed as a resident. However, that was on May 1, 74. But on May 11, 74, 10 days later, Mr. O’Shea wrote to Lolo, in Indonesia, reiterating the accusation.

So either S. Ann’s letter got lost in the mail (going from one address in Honolulu to another in Honolulu) for more than a week, or else Mr. O’Shea didn’t accept S. Ann’s contention about how Lolo filed, or else he didn’t get the letter because it was never sent, being created on a computer decades later, in order to obfuscate.

The more important question is what was on those redacted tax returns? Was Soebarkah mentioned, perhaps? What kind of benefits would Lolo get based upon filing as a resident versus a non-resident? Did Soetoro claim Soebarkah as his dependent, non-resident alien child? Enquiring minds want to know.


618 posted on 08/03/2010 1:25:52 PM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson