To: satan
No. I worked at a Federal Records Center in Texas. At least 30 years ago there were something like 8 such facilities.
But an entire set of records is easier for me to believe as lost (inadvertently destroyed) than a single record of one person.
If only certain records of Stanley Anne Dunham or BHO or whoever were “lost”, I don’t think that would be an accident. It would mean someone went to incredible lengths to hide the real history of the Interloper in Chief.
332 posted on
08/01/2010 7:46:22 PM PDT by
comps4spice
(Can we deport Congress?)
To: comps4spice
And Sandy Burgler proved democrats have no qualms in stealing from the National Archives to suit their agendas.
334 posted on
08/01/2010 7:48:47 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Dem voters, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when deceived.)
To: comps4spice
If only certain records of Stanley Anne Dunham or BHO or whoever were “lost”, I don’t think that would be an accident. It would mean someone went to incredible lengths to hide the real history of the Interloper in Chief. I agree. It makes no sense that the mother's early passport application records have been destroyed with no archival.
471 posted on
08/02/2010 8:31:50 AM PDT by
snowsislander
(In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson