The scorecard in Obama eligibility lawsuits is Obama: 71/Birthers: 0. I’m certain that as a lawyer, Obama enjoys winning lawsuit after lawsuit, particularly since we the taxpaying American people cover his legal expenses since Inauguration Day.
Here’s what a conservative federal judge appointed by Ronald Reagan said about Orly Taitz:
“This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Constitution. See U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her. “—Chief US District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth in dismissing the Quo Warranto claim in Taitz v ObamaApril 14, 2010
The Court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in a grueling campaign for his partys nomination that lasted more than eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million. Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the President. It would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office he sought. Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is qualified to serve. Congress has not instituted impeachment proceedings, and in fact, the House of Representatives in a broad bipartisan manner has rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office. See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Cong. (2009) (commemorating, by vote of 378-0, the 50th anniversary of Hawaiis statehood and stating, the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961). US District Court Judge Clay D. Land in dismissing Captain Connie Rhodes v Colonel Thomas MacDonald et. al., September 16, 2009
Loosen your kneepads, shill, you’re cutting off oxygen to that tiny brain you have left.
It is up to Zero to prove he is a natural born citizen, not Ms. Taitz to disprove it. Zero has already publically admitted that he was born a British citizen, as were most if not all of our Founding Fathers. Our Founders did not regard themselves as natural born citizens and wrote an exemption for them into our Constitution; that exemption has expired and cannot apply to Zero.
The only thing quixotic about the case overseen by Judge Lamberth is his finding. There is nothing foolish or capricious about pointing out facts admitted by Zero that prove he is not Constitutionally qualified to hold office. It is sad to see a federal judge have such disregard for the law of the land.
Judge Carter undoubtedly displayed courage at Khe Sahn, because he certainly displayed none in his courtroom. The act of 69 million people in a popular election does nothing to amend or void our Constitution.
Judge Land is another unpatriotic moronic coward. Just because opposing candidates failed to question Zero's Constitutional qualifications does not negate those Consitutional criteria. Just because Congress appears happy with The Usurper doesn't amend or void our Constitution. And impeachment is a political proceeding; Ms. Taitz filed a legal action.
Finally, I find it interesting that Ms. Taitz's detractors here side step the facts and law in favor of ad hominem attacks. If conservatives are not willing and able to rally around the undisputed fact of Zero's natural-born British birth and our Constitution, America is no more.
And as a politician, Obama enjoys watching his opposition being tarred by association with the Birther crackpots.