More insults because you can't debate any of the links that I posted. Who is being intellectually dishonest? You.
No, I insulted you because you called me a "troll". I'm sorry you're too obtuse to pick up on that.
It's not the first time you have been called a troll. And you insult when you can't debate. I have given you at least 4 links to info all of which you have ignored because it doesn't fit your scenario.
What you don't seem to understand is that this isn't about Sherrod anymore. It's about the purposeful obfuscation with respect to what the import of her "speech" was that day in front of the NAACP.
Maybe she's a Marxist, maybe she's a racists, maybe she's a child-beating axe murderer. It's ALL immaterial to Brietbart's characterization (or mischaracterization) of her speech, and the excerpts of the speech he posted online.
You asserted that it (Breitbart's story) "wasn't about Sherrod", but quite clearly from Breitbarts original story it was ALL about Sherrod.
"It's not the first time you have been called a troll."
Well, if I'm a "troll", then I'm in excellent company with the likes of Anne Coulter, Jonah Goldberg and Powerlineblog.
Conservatives, to include conservative journalist, shouldn't engage in the same kind of yellow journalism that the liberals so frequently use. It's too bad you don't agree.