” Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg... “
Am I missing something? Since when does the Supreme Court “gather evidence” in the absence of a specific issue they are ruling on? Doesn’t a case have to be brought before them for their consideration, and that would only be after the case made its way through the lower court system?
Prescisely my question. The last I knew, cases challenging these Obama policies/illegalities have to be brought all the way through the federal court suystem. The SCOTUS does not investigate and originate federal lawsuits. I'm surprised you were the first to raise this point on this thread.