Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Starman417
"Are they saying that Mehserle did not even have cause to Taser Oscar Grant?"

That's exactly what I say. And, as such, the verdict should have been Murder 2 since by bringing any weapon to bear on a prostrate, fully controlled civilian Mehserle was demonstrating an "obvious lack of concern for human life."

Mehserle was in a rage and wanted to hurt Grant. The fact that he was too stupid to know the difference between a taser and a gun is secondary to the discussion.
3 posted on 07/12/2010 10:58:54 AM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Filo
"That's exactly what I say. "
"The fact that he was too stupid to know the difference between a taser and a gun is secondary to the discussion.
"
So you're no longer claiming he put away his taser so he could intentionally shoot him?
7 posted on 07/12/2010 11:38:30 AM PDT by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Filo
Mehserle was in a rage and wanted to hurt Grant. The fact that he was too stupid to know the difference between a taser and a gun is secondary to the discussion.

I unreservedly concur.

12 posted on 07/12/2010 11:53:20 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson