Posted on 07/06/2010 7:01:13 PM PDT by Neoavatara
Illegals: the mainspring of Obama’s re-election strategy once they get voting rights.
All the right does is bleat and ask a Federal judge to sort the matter out.
And if the Federal judge decides to side with the marxist enemy within, then what?
I say that is the point at which it is time to take sides and say enough; to openly defy the domestic marxist enemy within, and see if they have the stones to do something about it.
Time to amend the Immigration Act of 1965 and let white Europeans back into the mix.
That son of a bitch Ted Kennedys handiwork must be undone.
It’s all political.
demos already own blacks, unions, teachers, enviros, gays, lesbians, feminists, abortionists, Jews, muslims, prisoners,, and now they want to own the Latino voting block.
It really is hard to overcome such a voting block.
If the Latino vote is divided in battleground states, it could easily give the edge to the demos.
Everything the demos do is about gaining more power. They want to control everything we do.
The federal govt. has no reason to exist since it is not protecting our borders.
When even dopey Bill O’Reilly calls this a loser, it’s just gotta be a stinker.
Plus, based on poll data, a big majority of Arizonans are in favor of the law, and many of them are Hispanics. So Obama is going to pursue a losing strategy against the will of the people and in the end, may not even buy himself that much voting support.
So what is the Justice dept saying the state of Arizona is doing different from what a federal agent would also do. As an example during a raid on any business, don’t they ask all employees to show documentation of citizenship?
This is such a specious argument.
Epic fail is right.
The federal govt. has no reason to exist since it is not protecting our borders.
This should be grounds for impeachment. Even if we can’t get the vote, we can tie Congress up.
*
If Obama is arguing that states/locals cannot create their own laws on immigration enforcement even if they mirror fed or enhance fed laws, then how do they explain sanctuary cities who make their own laws up that are against fed enforcement of the laws??? Legal precedence says states can supplement and help fed laws, and cannot be contrary to fed law. Thus AZ is in line with precedence, and sanctuary cities are not. But Obama choses to go after AZ and not sanctuary cities. By the way, MO has the same immigration law as AZ, but they are not excoriated by the MSM because the MO gov is a Dem.
Can the Feds say to their creator (the states)? “We own enforecement of the border?” It seems a bit far fetched that if you delegate to someone that can’t do the job you can’t intervene and handle it yourself. But, our “9 Black Robed Wonders” will probably find a way to subject AZ to further kidnappings and killings.
They won’t have to.
They will simply argue that it is the feds right to enforce the law.
Period, paragraph.
They will not have to explain WHY they do not enforce the law, only that it is there prerogative to do so.
The judges will have to rule on the law, not what is right.
there=their
ICE has been totally undercut in this capacity. Even before Obama showed up in order to do a work place enforcement you had to build a case and get warrants. Despite what the left whines about, ICE doesn't just say "Hey, let's go raid the tortilla bakery." They have to do a lot of case work to get there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.