Wachovia admitted it didnt do enough to spot illicit funds in handling $378.4 billion for Mexican-currency-exchange houses from 2004 to 2007. Thats the largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money-laundering law, in U.S. history -- a sum equal to one-third of Mexicos current gross domestic product.
Wachovias blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations, says Jeffrey Sloman, the federal prosecutor who handled the case.
No bank has been more closely connected with Mexican money laundering than Wachovia. Founded in 1879, Wachovia became the largest bank by assets in the southeastern U.S. by 1900. After the Great Depression, some people in North Carolina called the bank Walk-Over-Ya because it had foreclosed on farms in the region.
Wells Fargo regrets that some of Wachovias former anti- money-laundering efforts fell short, spokeswoman Mary Eshet says. Wells Fargo has invested $42 million in the past three years to improve its anti-money-laundering program and has been working with regulators, she says.
The bank declined to answer specific questions, including how much it made by handling $378.4 billion -- including $4 billion of cash-from Mexican exchange companies.
The 1970 Bank Secrecy Act requires banks to report all cash transactions above $10,000 to regulators and to tell the government about other suspected money-laundering activity. Big banks employ hundreds of investigators and spend millions of dollars on software programs to scour accounts.
No big U.S. bank -- Wells Fargo included -- has ever been indicted for violating the Bank Secrecy Act or any other federal law. Instead, the Justice Department settles criminal charges by using deferred-prosecution agreements, in which a bank pays a fine and promises not to break the law again.
No Capacity to Regulate
Large banks are protected from indictments by a variant of the too-big-to-fail theory.
Indicting a big bank could trigger a mad dash by investors to dump shares and cause panic in financial markets, says Jack Blum, a U.S. Senate investigator for 14 years and a consultant to international banks and brokerage firms on money laundering.
The theory is like a get-out-of-jail-free card for big banks, Blum says.
Theres no capacity to regulate or punish them because theyre too big to be threatened with failure, Blum says. They seem to be willing to do anything that improves their bottom line, until theyre caught. That's a large snip but I assure you there is much more to see including charges against bank of America, Western Union, American Express, murders in Mexico and more.
The most galling thing is how a director at Wells Fargo reported this was happening and was ignored. Here is one more clip for the road.
Twenty million people in the U.S. regularly use illegal drugs, spurring street crime and wrecking families. Narcotics cost the U.S. economy $215 billion a year -- enough to cover health care for 30.9 million Americans -- in overburdened courts, prisons and hospitals and lost productivity, the department says.
Its the banks laundering money for the cartels that finances the tragedy, says Martin Woods, director of Wachovias anti-money-laundering unit in London from 2006 to 2009. Woods says he quit the bank in disgust after executives ignored his documentation that drug dealers were funneling money through Wachovias branch network.
If you dont see the correlation between the money laundering by banks and the 22,000 people killed in Mexico, youre missing the point, Woods says. Wachovia and Wells Fargo will both get off the hook on grounds of being too big to fail.
Its the banks laundering money for the cartels that finances the tragedy, says Martin Woods, director of Wachovias anti-money-laundering unit in London from 2006 to 2009. Woods says he quit the bank in disgust after executives ignored his documentation that drug dealers were funneling money through Wachovias branch network.
If you dont see the correlation between the money laundering by banks and the 22,000 people killed in Mexico, youre missing the point, Woods says. Wachovia and Wells Fargo will both get off the hook on grounds of being too big to fail.
Well, if Wells Fargo did not own Wachovia at the time, they are really not responsible in fact, although they are in law.
The proper course for the government would be to indict individuals who were working at Wachovia at the time.
If you’re a US citizen BOA will not let you open an account without ID.
If you’re an illegal they will. They’ll also facilitate wiring any money back to mexico.
Those thugs at Wachovia, should have been broke and in jail long before they bought wells Fargo & Co. And damn sure should be broke and in jail today.
Ping!