What does copyright law have to do with some lame blogger
scratching out some grammatically unsound and boring drivel
and then posting a teaser to it on FR, forcing readers to
provide blog hits to read the rest of the snivelly content?
What does copyright law have to do with some lame blogger
stealing someone's video off Youtube, embedding it on his
virus-laden blog and posting a teaser to it on FR, forcing readers to
provide blog hits to see a video the pimp HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH?
Eaker posted untrue words about copyright law, he stated one has to go through a legal process to obtain a copyright which as I showed is about as untrue as one can get. He asked why one would excerpt and I give him two reasons one he has a right to his copyright just like every other writer and two FR does not allow video on FR and to see such one has to leave FR but when you wish to comment or review a video one can embed the video on most blog software and thus it allows the reader to view the video and stay with the text that refers to the video without the need to surf to youtube or some other video site.
Either way neither is any business of yours, if you don't like so-called "blog pimps" why do you feel the need to rant about them causing more and more people to see the thread updated? Or is irony something that you can not comprehend?