Posted on 06/16/2010 8:29:24 AM PDT by TheNewPundit
This is an email I received today.
As a plaintiff on the Obamacare lawsuit, youve probably been asked why Obamacare is unconstitutional. So, I wanted to share a couple illustrations that explain why Obamacare is unconstitutional.
In 1919, the regulation of a drug alcohol required a Constitutional amendment to be ratified by the States. Yet, today we have the FDA which regulates every prescription drug and the DEA which regulates every illegal drug. We even have a Drug Czar on the Presidents cabinet. So how did we go from requiring a Constitutional amendment to regulate just one drug, to multiple Federal agencies that regulate drugs without any Constitutional amendment whatsoever? The answer is that the Supreme Courts Commerce Clause precedent destroyed the limitations placed upon the Federal Government by our Founding Fathers.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewpundit.com ...
YES! Overturn Wickard v Filburn!
Yah right. That supposed Commerce Clause which completely destroyed the USConst. ability to limit and enumerate the powers of the DC gangsters.
It's easier to destroy something than to build and protect something.
THAT is just for starters!!! Even IF there would be 150% of the population contributing, the services delivered and administered by a Government cannot be equal or preferable to privately delivered/administered health care.
No, it didn't.
"An amendment to the Constitution obviously appealed to temperance reformers more than a federal statute banning liquor. A simple congressional majority could adopt a statute but, with the shift of a relatively few votes, could likewise topple one. Drys feared that an ordinary law would be in constant danger of being overturned owing to pressure from liquor industry interests or the growing population of liquor-using immigrants. A constitutional amendment, on the other hand, though more difficult to achieve, would be impervious to change. Their reform would not only have been adopted, the Anti-Saloon League reasoned, but would be protected from future human weakness and backsliding."
Repealing National Prohibition, David Kyvig, 1979, The University of Chicago Press
"The purpose of this lawsuit is to reverse Supreme Court precedent related to the Commerce clause and thereby overturn Obamacare. The Supreme Court has historically erred in its interpretation of the Constitutional role of the Federal Government. Recent Supreme Court rulings hint that they may be willing to take another look at Commerce clause precedent. Obamacare is so over reaching and so onerous, that it must either be repealed in Congress or struck down in the courts. We must fight this on both fronts. This is our historic opportunity to reverse Americas trend toward Socialism by overturning this unconstitutional precedent.
If you are a US citizen and agree with the goal of this lawsuit, please join us. If you have concerns about joining, please review the FAQs for more information. Every person we add strengthens the voice of "We the People".
OVER 10,000 AMERICANS JOIN LAWSUIT AGAINST OBAMACARE
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.