[rxsid]

"” And of course you would too.” WOuld what? Assume you dislike Obama? The difference is in your case it’s a guess, whereas I know where you’re coming from."

What you started back in post #50:

"But you don’t like Obama, so you’ll say anything." I then stated that you like Obama, so you don't care that a usurper is in the W.H. (paraphrasing). That's what. The irony here, is that it's you who is guessing. I've given numerous sources in many of my posts. You've done nothing but offer up your opinion that's unsubstantiated.

[Tublecane]

“’But you don’t like Obama, so you’ll say anything.’ I then stated that you like Obama, so you don’t care that a usurper is in the W.H. (paraphrasing). That’s what.”

I have actual evidence to believe you don’t like Obama. You possess nothing of the kind for my alleged love of Obama. False equivocation.

“The irony here, is that it’s you who is guessing. I’ve given numerous sources in many of my posts. You’ve done nothing but offer up your opinion that’s unsubstantiated.”

That’s beside the point. If I’m untethered on the larger issue it doesn’t change anything about this sub-issue.

By the way, people’s long, colorful posts with quotations from Vattel and scans of various old books aren’t necessarily substantial. Most of the time, they are proffered with little or no prompting. And they’re always the same, on every thread, regardless of the particular conversation. Easy way to avoid real argument.

[bushpilot1]

Your thread has the freeper Obots in a frenzy...wonder why.