[Quix]

The webbot commentators sound like they have a clue what’s going on with it predicting things like quakes, 911 etc.

They don’t. It’s wild arsed assumptions and fantasies as to what is going on that it successfully predicts such things.

It is !INTERESTING! that it DOES so.

No one knows how or why—including the originators.

[shibumi]

"The webbot commentators sound like they have a clue what’s going on with it predicting things like quakes, 911 etc. They don’t. It’s wild arsed assumptions and fantasies as to what is going on that it successfully predicts such things. It is !INTERESTING! that it DOES so. No one knows how or why—including the originators."

And - they have no certainty that it will do anything with accuracy in the present or future.

They know only what ~has~ happened. They are also not telling you if the data they report is *all* the data they collect.

"Behold, I come like a thief in the night..." does not sound like the Second Coming is going to be announced on the internet. But whether it is or is not, the best way is "Semper Paratus."

If the contention is that a web bot can sometimes sync up with the Jungian sub-consciousness, then perhaps. But would you say that it should then, on the basis of a few "hits" become your oracle? Hardly.

Was this message correctly heard by the original poster? Perhaps. But I'd give it a lot more credence if he had been calling NSA, DARPA or a hotline for the EPA. Protecting the protectors of fiat currency in the case of a global upheaval doesn't strike me as a likely priority.