Facts are stubborn things and some people are so emotionally attached to this issue that they resort to calling disruptors those who are doing nothing more than pointing out what the outcome of this unfortunate affair are likely to be. Your insights are right on the mark and I agree with your position. There are those who choose not to listen and will be disappointed by the turn of events.
Huet-Vaughan was a very shocked woman when she reported into the USDB and discovered the difference between an officer and a prisoner. Lakin will have the same experience.
Yeah yeah, keep beating the drum for 0thugga. Your choice.
A disruptor on this issue would be someone who constantly makes the same point when their point has been countered many times. Another example is refusing to answer questions about their position, but asking new questions back at the questioner. That's why I called some one a disruptor. Actually IIRC I gave a choice between disruptor and someone who is incapable of seeing what is in front of their eyes. Difficult to know someone's motivation, as your response illustrates.