[Non-Sequitur]

The constitutional qualifications of the CIC are at the core of military legitimacy and authority. That you don't recognize that is an sad explanation of your position.

And where is that relevant to what Lakin is charged with? What article of the UCMJ or what federal law or what court precedent shows that the legitimacy of Lakin's brigade commander's orders rested with Obama?

I continue to question your motivation and your willingness to accept the CIC's guilty behavior in light of the number of challenges raised and the obvious questions which are unanswered. It is indicative of his lack of respect for us and his willingness to waste time and resources to protect information the electorate is entitled to have. At worst, it is a transparent attempt to continue the biggest fraud in the history of the country.

And you're entitled to do so. But again, Obama or his eligibility or his lack of respect for the military or any of his other traits and characteristics you care to mention are still irrelevant to Lakin's guilt or innocence. Obama may be Lakin's motivation, but what motivated him does not excuse multiple violations of the UCMJ. The bank robber may plead poverty and dire circumstances, but that doesn't excuse sticking up the bank.

The consequences of me being wrong are insignificant and easily overcome. The consequences of you being wrong are beyond tragic.

Hyperbole aside, how does that make Lakin innocent of the charges against him?

Why are you not joining the call for him to open his records and end all of this?

Because Obama isn't listening to me.

[whence911]

I have not argued the relevancy of the charges against him. I have argued the responsibility of the CIC to establish that he is legitimate and is weilding his war powers as the rightful holder of those powers.

If you don't know the relevancy of legitimate military authority in a representative democracy, I will not continue to waste my time.

[whence911]

PS: you motivation is very relevant. Either you are a disruptor and are intentionally being obstinate or you are a true believer that we don't need a president who meets constitutional requirements. Either are detrimental to the goal of a legitimate election and the trust with which we empower the CIC.