Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: whence911
I would say that the CIC's qualifications for the job have not been established and since it is a concern nationwide, the same concern has surfaced in the military.

There are several million active duty, reserve, and retired service men and women in this country. Only a dozen or so have pursued Obama's eligibility in the courts and only one that I'm aware of has courted a court martial over it. Whatever concerns the rest of the military personnel may have over Obama's eligibility, it isn't affecting their ability to perform their duties.

Were I in the military today I would do the same thing and take the same action even if I had to go to jail.

And if I were still in the military today I would recommend the same course of action for you that the military has taken with Lakin.

The fact that you don't challenge Obama on the same grounds, but argue with those who do, is a source of puzzlement for me, but hey, have at it.

What I may think about Obama's eligibility or lack there-of is irrelevant to the topic of discussion. We're talking about military officers who take it upon themselves to decide what orders are legal and what are not. I did not agree with Huet-Vaughan or Watada or New when they did it, I do not agree with Lakin either. Good order and discipline require that servicemen obey the orders of their superior officer. Lakin didn't do that and Obama's eligibility doesn't change the facts of the case. Obama could be found ineligible and removed from office tomorrow, and Lakin would still be guilty of disobeying his brigade commander and of missing movement. Why is that so hard to understand?

47 posted on 06/16/2010 9:11:40 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
The constitutional qualifications of the CIC are at the core of military legitimacy and authority. That you don't recognize that is an sad explanation of your position.

The fact that a few have been willing to step up may not be indicative of the actual number who question the CIC's qualifications. And the impact on morale is unknown to both you and me.

I continue to question your motivation and your willingness to accept the CIC's guilty behavior in light of the number of challenges raised and the obvious questions which are unanswered. It is indicative of his lack of respect for us and his willingness to waste time and resources to protect information the electorate is entitled to have. At worst, it is a transparent attempt to continue the biggest fraud in the history of the country.

The consequences of me being wrong are insignificant and easily overcome. The consequences of you being wrong are beyond tragic.

Why are you not joining the call for him to open his records and end all of this?

51 posted on 06/16/2010 9:28:47 AM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson