Phil you don't get it. It's not about making anyone happy. It's about factually relaying information which WND did. By your own admission you strain at gnats only to swallow camels. In other words while you're attempting to, "knock down perceptions that might not necessarily be completely true." What you actually did was allow your own bias to construct the false premises that you claim to fight against. Ergo creating a loop ad infinitum of your own mistrust and misinformation.
Ah, well -- I guess I just don't "get it."
That's OK. My site's been following the eligibility issue since late 2008, so I have a veritable portfolio of evidence for the casual observer to either confirm or deny what you claim about me.
-Phil
You like anyone else may have some truth on your blog but is it the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Which seems to be your standard?
And should we examine everything you write to knock down perceptions that might not necessarily be completely true in your blogging?
Just from what you’ve posted today we would find your blog woefully beneath your own standards for truth.
Regards
Al