Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void
"Doesn’t matter where he was born. His father was a British subject, that makes him, at best, a dual citizen at birth."

Correct. Dual national at birth, does not make one a natural born citizen of the U.S.

137 posted on 06/10/2010 12:43:44 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid
Correct. Dual national at birth, does not make one a natural born citizen of the U.S.

Even if British law did or does not make him a British citizen at birth, the fact that both his parents were not US citizens would disqualify him.

Under the 14th amendment he would be a citizen, same as Wong Kim Ark, but not a natural born on. The 14th amendment does not contain the words "Natural born citizen" or even "natural born". Thus it did not redefine the term as originally understood. Which of course was "born in the country of parents who are it's citizens".

255 posted on 06/10/2010 3:57:42 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson