Free Republic does not seem to share our concern.
I know it’s not the New York Times.
But, why put Pat Condell into chat?
I disagree; FR is an open forum allowing this kind of debate to occur as standard operating procedure. FR’s concern is more about freedom of thought, word and debate on all subjects primarily of a conservative/libertarian nature. As for Pat Condell, why shouldn’t he be put into chat? The more exposure to Condell’s comments, the better, whether you agree with him or not. I happen to agree with Condell on the vast majority of what he says. History proves it, wouldn’t you agree?