[Lakeshark]

Well, Sir Rabadash Rabs, it goes to the heart of your judgement. That you picked these two loons, and yes, they are loons, to support tells us all we need to know about you and how you think. They are ridiculous choices, way off the chart of sane.

It's why the title "ridiculous" fits.

So are you going to come and defend your choices? Do you still support Ron Paul? Or are you going to man up and admit you were way off the mark in picking them..........

[mkjessup]

Once again, this has nothing to do whatsoever with the topic of the thread, which is the assumption by some writer that a dead man (Buckley) who is no longer able to speak for himself would support this cause, or that cause, or approve of any candidate, be it Sarah Palin or anyone else.

You question Rabs 'judgment' regarding two public figures (Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin), but that has nothing to do with anything in this thread.

You need to stay on topic and stop bringing up meaningless bullsh*t.
Rabs original comment was:

You gotta watch the Palinista propaganda machine
Is that the same thing as the Palinista smear machine, in which Palinbots attack staunch conservatives in order to eliminate the competition for their beauty queen candidate?

Note that Rabs comment had nothing to do with either Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin, it had everything to do with the Palinista attack/propaganda/smear machine, and not a few of the cogs of that machine reside right here on FR, and anytime a less than adulatory comment is made about Saint Sarah, they come out of the woodwork, and there is no pretending otherwise.

Try engaging in meaningful debate and discussion instead of yabbering away about 'Ron Paul/Chuck Baldwin' which have nothing to do with the topic of the thread.