Personally, I don't see how she can overcome the negative connotations of quitting...oh, I'm sorry... resigning...mid-way through her first term.
And, please don't start with the "She was $500,000 in debt for the 'frivolous' ethics complaints" song and dance.
Mrs Palin campaigned on "cleaning up corruption" and she herself signed the (rather vaguely written) AK ethics legislation into law. Didn't she read what she had enacted? That's just what we need--more pols who don't read what they sign.
Personally, I am very disturbed by someone using their office to try to have someone fired due to a personal, family grudge. (This, if you will recall, was the one complaint not dismissed by the Governor-appointed ethics review board.) I am also troubled by having an unelected spouse butt in to government business. (We certainly bristled when HRC did it, didn't we?)
Yep, I'm glad that the blogger in the original article believes that camp Romney is going to be hitting the "Q" question. That way, we don't have to have a rehash of Mrs Palin's ethical escapades and the retelling of the tawdry antics of her family.
Have a great day!
You do give too much credit to the lib talking points, which is a bit disconcerting.
I'll ask again, are you a mitten? And if not do you support a candidate (or plural)?