>>I certainly didnt spend 9 years in the Army to allow the police/border-patrol to ignore the Constitution I swore to defend.
>
>theyre foriegners and have no rights!
Incorrect. There ARE such things as human-rights, no? (If you disagree then I ask you to defend the “Crimes Against Humanity” charges in Nuremberg.)
Also, Constitutionally speaking, the rights acknowledged by the Constitution are generally qualified as to things the Government is kept from doing:
The First Amendment does NOT say “Congress pass no law establishing religion, except for foreigners[...]”.
The Second Amendment is arguable because of the reference to the militia in conjunction with “the right of the people”.
The Third Amendment does not exempt the homes of resident aliens.
The Fourth Amendment does not secure the [supposed] right to have a warrant “Particularly describing the person or things to be seized” to Citizens only, but establishes that burden-of-responsibility to lie squarely on the proper officials REGARDLESS of the accused’s nationality.
The Fifth and Sixth Amendments do not exclude foreigners from seeking relief in our court systems, either criminal or civil.
The Constitution doesn’t cover foriegners, only citizens and those here legally with visas.
If they sneak in kill them on sight!