LA Lakers to Boycott Second Game of the Western Conference Finals Against Phoenix Suns (SATIRE)

www.jimbyrd.com ^ | 05/19/2010 | Jim Byrd

[jim byrd]

Nothing quite aggregates the inerudite fog that the Obama administration, the Democratic led Congress, and the heterogeneous disposition that various states and cities wander around in, than the above quote. And the Attorney General of this "nation of cowards," epitomized the Obama administration last week when asked by the House Judiciary Committee if he had read the new 10 page Arizona immigration law. Holder, after spending weeks denouncing, criticizing, and demonizing the law because it “has the possibility of leading to racial profiling,” was “unfortunate,” and because he questioned whether the law was unconstitutional, answered,

[Dog]

What the hell you talking about?

[GeronL]

forfeit?

Wait, are they out of the playoffs?

[cripplecreek]

LOL

[Zuben Elgenubi]

This is a disingenuous headline and link to your blog. I’m not going there and you should be ashamed of yourself.

[Dog]

Someone had to say it...:-)

[I still care]

There was an article a while ago on what sports were watched by what constituances.

The NBA was strongly Democrat.

[WakeUpAndVote]

SNIFF!

[reg45]

Is that boycott as in FORFEIT? So, does that mean that all Arizona teams will win ALL of their home games by FORFEIT?

[Walkingfeather]

idiot

[Axeslinger]

Sometimes you just want to slap the sh!t out of some of these people, don’t you?

[Eric in the Ozarks]

We’re weeks away from summer and the NBA is still playing.

[davius]

Following is the Arizona Immigration Law as obama administration officials believe it was written:

Law enforcement officers of the State of Arizona, whether representing town, city, county, or state agencies will henceforth be required to stop, interrogate, and if necessary, require proof of identity and/or immigration status from the following persons: those who by their dress, appearance, language, mores, behavior, or who otherwise draw the attention of the officer and cause them to suspect that the individual in question is not a legal and legitimate member of the social structure of the United States. If; as a result of the inquiry, they determine that the suspect is not in the country legitimately, said suspect must be arrested and remanded to ICE as soon as is practicable. Any property in the possession of the suspect will be retained by the arresting officer and disposed of at his or her discretion. Any minor children will be remanded to Child Protective Services unless they are conversant in English, in which case they may be placed in the custody of a trade school. Female family members may be conveyed to ICE with male suspects, but depending on her appearance she may; at the officer’s discretion, be sent to the hunting camp in Skeleton Canyon.

[cowboyway]

Shamelessness.

You own it.

[Jonah Hex]

I predict a bad end to this posting.

[mikelets456]

Let me guess ..... they read the bill? Wait, can they read?

[latina4dubya]

I have not had a chance to — I’ve glanced at it. I’ve just expressed concerns on the basis of what I’ve heard about the law. But I’m not in a position to say at this point, not having read the law, not having had the chance to interact with people are doing the review, exactly what my position is.

oh brother... he's not in a position to say exactly what his position is? really? so at this point he's neutral? when my kids give me answers like this, they get in trouble for trying to mislead... lying... hiding...

[Zuben Elgenubi]

Yes. This type of post is becoming increasingly frequent and it reflects a sly attitude of commercial opportunism, as if we don’t see the maneuver.

[Robe]

I love that ole plane .. Two turnin and two burin... P2V’s rocked ...

unless you had to spend 8hrs in ‘em flyin in circles ...

[latina4dubya]

p.s.—i don’t mind that this is coming from you blog... why do people get so mad about that?