Based on your comment, I have amended my essay to read:
“Mr. Smith, like so many television, radio, and print media commentators, editors, and journalist, is also probably deliberately failing to report the well-known fact that there is a valid constitutional argument that place of birth is only one part of the “natural born Citizen” test for Presidential eligibility.”
Thank you wintertime.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
There is something else that I have never seen emphasized.
Obama is misusing and wasting U.S, attorney time and DOJ resources to hide common documents that unanointed Americans routinely release for many reason.
Obama has, and is, distracting U.S. attorneys from their important job of getting the “bad guys”. Obama did this when plots were being laid to:
**BLOW UP TIMES SQUARE
**BLOW UP a RIITTSBURGH MARATHON
**BLOW A PLANE OUT OF THE SKY OVER DETROIT
** KILL SOLDIERS ON THEIR BASES AND RECRUITMENT CENTERS
Yes, I am personally outraged that Obama would **do** that! Yes, I am having a minor temper tantrum. And...While I know that the mainstream media is utterly infested with Marxists, I am appalled that the conservative media would ignore this!
We are in your debt, sir.
It is simply historical and constitutional fact that the president must be born to two American Citizens. There is no other definition at the founding.
I think this will not be ruled on until Obama has made his exit in 2012 because of fear of riots. Its just that simple. After he is retired it can and must be established so that this never happens gain.