It’s interesting because it list’s pages as 802, and then physical pages as 728. Strange. I wonder if the 802 page reference is a typo by whomever entered the electronic description.
We should compare the Luke White, the one in the Australian library..something is amiss..
Someone needs to visit the Library of Congress..to see the darn thing..to many times..an online website says they have a certain edition..but it is not what we are looking for..
It is a rare book..lets not commit this is the real deal...agreed?