Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

Yes. I already posted this copy form Australia months ago. The cover is correct. The content is not. I have a copy of this and have verified the content to be an exact match to the Luke White edition.

I am not sure why the content was switched, but if you grab a copy of the Luke White edition you will see they are identical, which is not correct for the New York publication. My assumption is the library lost the scans of the book and inserted the information from the LW edition.


360 posted on 04/29/2011 8:43:13 PM PDT by devattel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]


To: devattel; bushpilot1; Spaulding; Red Steel; patlin
The Library of Congress holding for Law of Nations New York edition 1787...according to Cengage Learning:

Looks like there is no 1787 version that states "natural born" instead of native.

363 posted on 05/20/2011 7:38:56 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson