Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: wintertime

Please explain how Beck’s failure to support the birther movement translates into him being a turncoat and a failure with zero interest in defending the Constitution.

Your letter was an emotional response to a political issue. Beck DEALS IN FACTS, which is why he is reluctant to support the birthers. This does not, by any stretch of the imagination, mean that he is a failure, or a sellout, or that this is even a “deal-breaker” of an issue.

On another note, he does more to defend this country and its Constituion in a single day than most people do in a lifetime. Grow up.


12 posted on 05/12/2010 11:20:18 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: snowrip

Regardless of whether Beck supports “birthers” or not, I have to agree - he must deal with facts. To date, we don’t have the facts because all zero’s records have been sealed. I don’t appreciate Glenn calling birthers names, but, he is entitled to his opinion just the same as anyone else. I do believe that when things come to light, then he will apologize. I guess I should say “if” these things ever come to light, and I believe they will in due time.


22 posted on 05/12/2010 12:58:30 PM PDT by Catsrus (Have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson