I saw this yesterday. But I refused to post it because the author is such an imbecile.
Even if I believed the abstract contained all the relevant information, I’d still have to admit that I had not seen the original.
(I don’t believe the abstract contains all relevant info)
The is no good reason not to show the original, long form birth certificate. No one can give a good reason.
The only questions that need to be repeated over and over to the media is: “Why won’t they show the original flippin’ birth certificate? What difference could it possibly make?”
Even if the Pope swore on a stack of Bibles at the bedside of Billy Graham that he had seen the original, that (1) STILL would not prove that they’d seen what we’re talking about, and (2) would not answer why a simple thing like the original won’t be shown.