Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/11/2010 8:07:55 AM PDT by Patriot1259
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Patriot1259

I just eat a can of sardines occasionally.


2 posted on 05/11/2010 8:09:04 AM PDT by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patriot1259

IMHO, the concern about mercury in fish oil supplements is not warranted.

http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/lovaza-vs-fish-oil-supplements.html


3 posted on 05/11/2010 8:16:06 AM PDT by Madam Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patriot1259

There are non-fish oil omega-3 supplements out there.
Here’s a link to one, but feel free to google for alternative brands.
http://www.devanutrition.com/vegan_DHA.html


5 posted on 05/11/2010 8:26:32 AM PDT by two23 (Everything about them is a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patriot1259
But if someone has a low risk of heart disease and is concerned, then he or she could stop taking the supplements ........to find other sources of omega-3 acids such as fatty fish.

Isn't that ~Like~ the same thing?

6 posted on 05/11/2010 8:27:57 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patriot1259

Lots of twists and turns to this.

To start with, the desired active ingredient in fish oil is called Omega-3. Omega-3 is known to have anti-inflammatory properties, and works best in a balance with Omega-6, which most people get more than enough of in their diet. Importantly, Omega-6 has a mild inflammatory property.

So if you take a fish oil supplement, you want one with minimal Omega-6.

In turn, Omega-3 has two ingredients, called EPA and DHA. Of these two, DHA is the one that provides the greatest benefits. So much so that it is now being sold as a separate supplement. (Not to be confused with DHEA, which is a different supplement.)

Importantly, many types of fish oil are known to be high in urea, so if a person has a predisposition to gout, caused by too much urea in the blood, they should not take fish oil.

Otherwise, from a dietary perspective, fats and oils, by themselves, do not contribute much to weight gain, and may even result in weight loss, *unless* they are combined with carbohydrates. The two together most definitely are the recipe for weight gain.

So if you consume more fish oil, you should consume far less carbohydrates. And of those carbohydrates you consume, they should be far fewer simple carbohydrates, like sugars, and more like complex carbohydrates, long-chain carbohydrates that are harder to digest.

Do not be deceived by sugar substitutes, especially sugar alcohols, that do not affect the blood sugar levels because they are digested far down the digestive tract. They are still carbohydrates, and will still work with fats and oils to cause weight gain.

High fructose sugars are regarded as worse in this regard than ordinary sucrose, because they are more readily converted into fat.

One of the contributing factors to weight gain that may be helped by fish oil, are clusters of cells found in the fat, and proportionately more in the fat of obese people, called MAST cells. MAST cells produce histamines when irritated, resulting in something like an allergic reaction, but one that encourages fat cell growth and retention.

The DHA in Omega-3 in fish oil may help settle down irritated MAST cells, making it easier to lose weight.


8 posted on 05/11/2010 8:40:08 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patriot1259

Buy the kind that doesn’t have these chemicals. They are available.


11 posted on 05/11/2010 8:56:51 AM PDT by Flavius Maximus (In the end, we all get what we deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patriot1259

Are the fish found in Japan lower in mercury?? Cause the Japanese eat much more fish than Americans and, well a few years ago when I last checked, the Japanese have a longer life expectancy than Americans.

So, if eating fish is bad, shouldn’t it be bad for those living in Japan as well?


18 posted on 05/11/2010 10:01:53 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson