That "whoever" is Tom Campbell and Palin could never endorse him and her endorsement in the general would be a negative in California anyway, don't you guys pay any attention to politics?
Tom Campbell is truly radically left, Campbell is enthusiastically pro homosexual, he is strongly against prop8 and is a true proponent of "gay" marriage, Campbell is not "soft" on abortion, he truly and openly is pro-abortion. There was not Campbell endorsement coming.
I’ve met Campbell. I know all about him.
However, Carly has a terrible reputation in the Silicon Valley.
She is no Meg Whitman. People liked working for Whitman. She is highly respected, even by people that don’t agree with her politics. Most people agree she was a good CEO.
That is not the case with Carly.
To me the choice is really between Devore or Campbell. Carly is the low one on the totem pole. I don’t trust her.
Campbell, I don’t agree with on the social issues, but he’s honest.
Devore I agree with, but I think voting for him give Carly the edge. I’d rather have Campbell over Carly.
Just thinking out loud here.
One thing that I cannot stand about our current crop of politicians is that they do not have a firm stance on the issues. They will flip flop depending on the current polling data. They will make back room deals, and you really don’t know how they will vote because they don’t have strong convictions.
I feel like Fiorina is more of the same. She is in it for herself, and she will bend with the polling data.
I would rather have someone who is a little more liberal, but you know where they stand. I can stand Joe Lieberman more than Olympia Snowe. Sure Joes more liberal, but you can make plans for that. Snowe blows with the wind.
Campbell is more liberal, but he’s been pretty firm on his stance for the issues for years. You know where his is coming from.
Devore is definitely the most conservative, and he is firm on the issues.
Fiorino - I think she blows with the political winds, and that totally bugs me.