You tried that the last time we exchanged thoughts...LOLOLOLOL........
A dismissal is not an Evidentuary Finding and you know it....Show me a case where a Court said that Obama met the requirements of eligibility to be President as you contend.....you can’t, because they haven’t...
No Cigar..... try some one in the 3rd grade, maybe they’ll buy that arguement.....LOLOLOLOLOLOL
See ya Sonny...your momma’s calling ya!
You tried that the last time we exchanged thoughts...LOLOLOLOL........
A dismissal is not an Evidentuary Finding and you know it....Show me a case where a Court said that Obama met the requirements of eligibility to be President as you contend.....you can’t, because they haven’t...
No Cigar..... try some one in the 3rd grade, maybe they’ll buy that arguement.....LOLOLOLOLOLOL
See ya Sonny...your momma’s calling ya!
“This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Constitution. See U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”—Chief Judge Royce Lamberth in dismissing the Quo Warranto claim in “Taitz v Obama”—April 14, 2010
Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we CONCLUDE that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States natural-born citizens.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels, Nov. 12, 2009. Appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court, rejected on April 6, 2010.
“State Justices Reject Birther Lawsuit”: http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/lake/article_4da2bd4c-62b3-556f-a97c-8c3009013129.html
You have yourself a lovely day now.