[TexasCajun]

You answered my post/question.

...her vote was NOT needed.

[Sybeck1]

Her vote did give bipartisan cover though, back when the Dems wanted that.

[silverleaf]

her vote was needed to make it look like this stinker had
“bipartisan” sppport

all the GOP shares democrat failure when a bill is “bipartisan”- except the GOP gets all the blame by the democrats - that’s why Nan and Harry with their majorities, fight so hard to ridicule and bribe Republicans into voting for this crap

Didn’t Olympia hold out on the “Finanicial Reform Bill”?
Maybe she figured out she was played, since I don’t think obama has called, written, or sent flowers since that vote, and no more dinners at the WH

[Alaphiah123]

Her vote was needed one vote from the opposing party is need to move a bill out of committee. Look it up