Posted on 04/26/2010 10:21:49 AM PDT by rxsid
"Educating The Really Really Confused About “Nbc-gate”
It looks like Nbc-Gate is hitting top volume. I’ve witnessed some very desperate blogging propaganda trying to stop the bleeding as the nation finally wakes up to the fact that President Obama was a British citizen at the time of his birth. Having been born with dual nationality, he was born with a recognized allegiance to a foreign nation. I have explained previously in great detail why this disqualifies him from being President.
The historical dam is breaking as more and more evidence surfaces proving Obama is not eligible. A reader of this blog who has asked to remain anonymous recently provided further historical proof that Obama is not eligible to be president. The New Englander And Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845) states
The expression ‘citizen of the United States occurs in the clauses prescribing qualifications for Representatives, for Senators, and for President. In the latter, the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.That is serious on point historical research. At the time of his birth, Obama owed allegiance to Great Britain. That is not disputed, it is admitted by the President himself. And this admission is the true problem Obama faces should this issue ever make its way to the Supreme Court. Obama owed allegiance to great Britain when he was born."
(Excerpt) Read more at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
I just noticed the large presence in the bottom photo of BO. WTF, is that some kind of a poster someone in the group is holding?
I meant top photo, not bottom.
One of the more interesting details about O is that in 1991...Simon and Schuster paid him $100000 for an autobiography...at age 30...already a payoff...from someone to someone for something. CIA does that kinda stuff for its operatives and their families...
It’s a cardboard cut-out of the WON.
However, who might the elderly man wearing the hat and carrying the whisk be, if not the HEAD OF THE OBAMA CLAN?
The direct decendant of ONYANGO OBAMA, his eldest son, YUSUF.
Ha! I was on that thread and found a reference for Malik’s birth date as being 1958. What the heck does all this mean. Why would Kesia fabricate a date five years off? We never solved that one back then. Who is Obama, really?
Hasn’t Rev. Manning (Obama the Mack Daddy) been promoting the idea that Obama was/is CIA?
Don’t know...but IMHO...his grandaddy/daddy..Stanley Armour Dunham was....he was chasing commies from Chicago ...to Washington state...and to Hawaii....and I suspect, to Kenya...too bad his FBI file was “destroyed” ..in “1997”...
And Frank Marshall Davis, Stanley’s buddy, was supposedly on the FBI payroll and, in his words, feeding them a bunch of false information and laughing all the way to make his bank deposit.
well there you go, see...lies never die, they just hang around and keep popping up again and again...
What the heck does all this mean. Why would Kesia fabricate a date five years off? We never solved that one back then.
It's possible she knew, when she gave that interview, that for the 'he left Kenya in 1959' to be correct, the child she had in 1953 simply had to be six years of age...because we really don't know what year he left Kenya, do we?
He wasn't anything to do with the airlift, he could have been on the US mainland for YEARS before he showed up in Hawaii.
Who is Obama, really?
He's not who he wants us to believe he is...
This is also interesting. This is a Military tribunal? Obama and Holder believe a military tribunal is not good enough for Kalid Sheik Mohammed, 9-11 mastermind. But an American asking to see his BC ... its just fine.
What they are not counting on is public reaction. If this guy goes to jail ...its going to get much uglier. (MO Ugly)
please stop making comments without sources, it’s not fair to any one.
Point being...tho...”Obama” is an assumed name..from the whole put-up job by his “daddy” foisting him off as his 1/2 sister’s(Stanley Ann Dunham)son from the most convenient/beleivable obliging black associate....
makes about as much sense as anything else about this Trojan Horse in our midst...
what would you like a source for? Simon and Schuster?
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/04/new_obama_bio_strengthens_case_1.html
Can you explain that? Do you know ANY other 30yr old in the HISTORY of the USA granted that kind of a contract?
I think that’s worthy of a brainstorm...especially as most anything “official or semi-official about him is clearly bunk.
there’s no more speculation here than anywhere else concerned with this guys origin.
This is also interesting. This is a Military tribunal? Obama and Holder believe a military tribunal is not good enough for Kalid Sheik Mohammed, 9-11 mastermind. But an American asking to see his BC ... its just fine.
What they are not counting on is public reaction. If this guy goes to jail ...its going to get much uglier. (MO Ugly)
Someone needs to scarf a DNA sample off this guy. It wouldn’t answer all the questions but it would help.
I'm referring to his mother was a black barmaid and his father was his 'grandfather' and Madelyn brought the boy up telling people the child belonged to her daughter...type of speculation...when what we need is more people prepared to do research. Like, find out WHEN Obama Senior came to the US, who did he know, who were his associates before he arrived in Hawaii.
For example, did you know that Oginga Odinga, who met with Malcolm X in Atlanta in 1959, was a teacher at the same school that Barack Hussein Obama Senior and his brother Jospeh/Yusuf attended?
Also, we dont know how the trial will unfold. There is a possibility that Obama will provide a BC, issue a pardon and send Lakin back to work.
Highly unlikely. I Can see Michelle Obamma now, “Put that Alabama cracker in jail and let him rot! Now lets take a vacation to Kenya, your Home country, to see how they spend American taxpayer money, Ha Ha !!!”
Most likely left over after removing the 666 mark from his head :-)
I see no possibility for it to be ugly. The formal check would be one of legal records and if there’s something in the legal records, it would be substantive and that person would simply have to withdraw.
There’s no such thing as a “failure” of a background check without factual cause.
That’s all well and good...problem is when you use the ‘net...there’s as much info and disinfo...heck...you your self even state about Stanley Ann Dunham
“...the less likely it becomes that she ever met Obama Snr. Anywhere.”
You post the picture of Obama Sr. being “greeted in Hawaii by Stanley Armour Dunham” as the picture is captioned on the net in various places and attributes. I would contend, that “absent” the leis’ around his neck not withstanding, , Stanley could have just have as easily been arriving WITH Barack Sr....
No, the best evidence about this guy is going to be circumstantial...and directly/indirectly from himself.
take that photo on the beach, for instance, is a father-child photo...
the presence of SO much ambiguity, as with the JFK assassination, clearly implicates the alphabet agencies in this guy’s history..big time...and hence the first modern internet candidate and presidency is the most manipulated.
I will grant you that circumstantially, one of his parents is Kenyan. Circumstantially, I highly doubt its his father.
Looking for a real African mother, tho, is harder than trying to pin down a nonexistent African father.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.