What did I say that was remotely protective of Islam? I will and have supported bombing Islamic countries if necessary, invading Islamic countries if necessary, and otherwise having our armed forces kill Muslims if necessary for the security of the United States of America. I don't want us doing that without good reason, because I understand the cost, but issues of Islamic terrorism may force that at times.
I simply do not believe that this country is in foreseeable danger of being taken over by its tiny Muslim population. We are more realistically in danger of succumbing to socialism by degrees or some variant of fascism over time, both of which are creations of Western civilization. That should be no surprise. We are obviously most vulnerable to falling from within to those philosophies that derive from our own culture and heritage, as opposed to a religion obscure to most Americans that is practiced by a tiny minority.
All you have been doing is making excuses for Islam. The violent aspect of Islam is the 2nd tier of the problem. The political aspect is an even bigger threat. We are not even close to winning this war, because of this aspect. Islamic history shows us that they do not have to be anywhere near the majority to win.
The Koran tells them this also. They do not have to vote the changes in now, they just keep having schools and businesses change for them. The left and Islam are working hand in hand, to destroy Western Civilization.
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2010/04/dhimmi-cancer-called-islam.html
Appears there’s a lot of smelly hot air in the emptiness between those ears which erupts like old faithful through the lips