Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Federalist Patriot

I tend to agree to Ann, too. Sarah is highly effective at energizing the conservative base, and that would be her most fitting role. Frankly, I wouldn’t blame her for taking a hard look at the whole intractable mess and saying “thanks but no thanks.”


9 posted on 04/21/2010 5:19:33 AM PDT by ScottinVA (RIP to the country I love...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ScottinVA
Sarah is highly effective at energizing the conservative base, and that would be her most fitting role. Frankly, I wouldn’t blame her for taking a hard look at the whole intractable mess and saying “thanks but no thanks.”

If I had to guess, I'd say that Sarah will not run. But I also think that she is keeping her options open.

Unfortunately the Dems have done a really good hit-job on her. She may be damaged beyond repair with independent voters.

On the other, other hand, Sarah Palin retains a lot of influence with the Republican voter. She may be able to influence who the eventual nominee is just by keeping open the possibility that she may jump in as (check one): a candidate for Prez, a VP runningmate for her favorite, or a 3rd party candidate if a Rhino looks to take the nomination.

She doesn't need to actually do one of these things... just publically entertain the idea. The Media will do the rest, and the oxygen will be sucked out of the room... and Sarah Palin gets her conservative way by mis-direction.

102 posted on 04/21/2010 7:39:52 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson