Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919
Any attorney who actually allows someone to invoke information derived from their, ahem, "vital records", without attempting to ascertain precisely what kind of documents that information was actually derived from, - is committing malpractice.

Dr. Fukino, even after her big public disclosures involving Obama's personal information, still refuses to validate that Certification of Live Birth that has been circulating on the web for a year and a half. Or refuses to even admit that the DoH actually issued Obama a certified copy of his Certification of Live Birth back in June of 2007. Why? Is that not a valid CoLB or not? Or even the image of valid CoLB or not?

If she *still* refuses to validate in any way, despite countless requests to do exactly that, why should anyone accept it as "proof"?

Fukino could do it in a hearbeat if she actually wanted do so. At least now that she's gone on record with his personal data and even attempted to officially declare him to be a "natural born citizen".

Why is it that she still refuses to vouch for Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth, number 151 1961-010641, issued to Barack Hussein Obama II, by her Department of Health back in 2007?

47 posted on 04/20/2010 1:42:04 PM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Cyropaedia

That certificate number obviously belongs to somebody else. I’m guessing the owner is listed in the same newspaper as the Nordyke twins.


48 posted on 04/20/2010 1:44:28 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson