“Lack standing” has been the ruling from all the Clinton-appointed federal judges that have tossed out the lawsuits.
Or they say: The voters have spoken in the last election.
???
If the voters voted to reinstate prayer in schools they’d toss it out tomorrow. They care what voters think?
That’s not the issue. Issue is: Obama has not proven he is eligible for the office of president. WHO has standing to challenge that? No Court has yet answered.
their attitude is that a person only has standing if the _resident is effectung them directly and doing them harm or standing in their way of progression (or some such crap)
I want the statement itself challenged and those judges FORCED to defend their statements. EVERY citizen will incur harm if the person taking the office was not eligible and has alligences to other countries.
I would see the military has being in direct line for questioning their orders if they believe those orders to be unlawful (isn’t that what we all have heard from the hippies??)
as a citizen, I am directly effected by 0bamas tax policies... pushed thru congress... and budget approved... and the IRS out to hunt for their pennies. I would contend I would have standing if I didn’t file... then get charged for not filing... my defense being that the congressional budget was not signed into law... as only the president can do that ... and witness testimony currently shows 0bama being ineligible to hold office... and until further ADMISSIBLE proof is provided (a jpeg is not admissible as a valid birth document)... we are left with witness testimony
And the Bush appointed.
And the Reagan appointed.
And the GWB appointed.
See any pattern there?
Maybe there’s like some basis in law or something?
If your vote mattered, they wouldn’t let you vote.
And at least one or two Bush appointed ones as well.
It is also very clear that BO does not -- under any circumstances and at whatever cost -- want the information on his birth certificate to be revealed, be it because he is not a natural-born citizen, or because it identifies his race as "Caucasian", or -- as demonstrably been the case throughout his privileged life -- because he is so special that the rules and laws simply don't apply to him, or because his ego cannot accept that others have the authority to tell him what to do.
I expect the courts to continue to avoid ruling on this matter by creating reasons to deny standing (as has been their normal practice) or finding ways to resolve their conflict without ruling (as in this case). I remain hopeful that somewhere there is an American patriot who knows the truth and will muster the courage to reveal it.