Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DrC
Thomas references to “you” clearly were to Serrano himself not to Congress in general.

True, but that jabbing was about the eligibility of those born in Puerto Rico. But it was still about the Natural Born Citizen requirement. Now why bring that up in the current environment. Serrano was born in Mayaguez Puerto Rico.

27 posted on 04/18/2010 10:06:04 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

“Now why bring that up in the current environment.”

Because SERRANO first brought up (jokingly) the question of his own presidential eligibility. Do you seriously think SERRANO was trying to tweak Obama on this question? Serrano then continued the joke by saying he appreciated that Thomas was willing to contemplate a non-judge to be on the Court, since he (Serrano) also was not a judge. Thomas (jokingly) replied “and you don’t have to be born in the United States. So you don’t have to answer that question.”

He DIDN’T say anything about “you don’t have to show your birth certificate,” so this clearly was a reference back to the original question of whether someone born in Puerto Rico was considered to be born in the U.S. for purposes of determining presidential eligibility.

Look at Thomas’ demeanor just before he makes this joke. He’s serious and responding to Serrano’s thanking him for his service. But it is Serrano who lightens the tone with his interjection about non-judges being able to serve on SC. Surely if Thomas had “planned” a zinger (or even did so extemporaneously), he would have made a point to specifically allude to showing a birth certificate. He could have been even more pointed by saying “you don’t even have to show your long-form birth certificate” etc.

I reiterate: this is much ado about nothing and I think it makes birthers look like real truth-stretchers to argue otherwise. At the end of the day, I don’t think that helps the birther cause. Better to rest on much more solid legal arguments such as Vattel’s claims in Law of Nations etc. From a logical perspective, invoking Thomas is relying on an “argument from authority” which is a logical fallacy. The truth of the claim about how NBC should be defined lies in legal arguments/evidence, not on a toting up of who is for or against one position or another.


28 posted on 04/18/2010 10:37:55 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson