Posted on 04/17/2010 12:21:03 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
The Obama administration, on a roll, will now ban the words Islam and jihad words that appeared hundreds of times in the 9/11 Commission report
In another clever and well researched piece, Bill Whittle of PJTV lays out disturbing evidence of a trend of appeasement and capitulation to radical Islam.
Highly recommended.
This usurper is dangerous.
Obama: the Left’s counterweight to 9/11.
I'll settle for sand nazi
instead.
THAT has got to be the most misleading headline in the history of the world!!!
Having said that, islam SHOULD be banned. NOW!
In Sarkozy's words.... DANGEROUS ALIENE. (Dangerous Sellout... Look up the word ALIENE, it's in the dictionary).
This is just another instance of Obama SELLING OUT to the MUSLIMS.
bump
Orwell gave us the gift of sight.
I’m beginning to think Obama might be some kind or radical or something.
Better Evil Death Cult and Struggle for Azzholehood.
Snips: Instead of calling terror groups Muslim or Islamic, the guide suggests using words like totalitarian, terrorist or violent extremist widely understood terms that define our enemies appropriately and simultaneously deny them any level of legitimacy.
By employing the language the extremists use about themselves, the guide warns, officials can inadvertently help legitimise them in the eyes of Muslims.
Never use the terms jihadist or mujahideen to describe the terrorists, instructs the guide. A mujahid, a holy warrior, is a positive characterisation in the context of a just war. In Arabic, jihad means striving in the path of God and is used in many contexts beyond warfare. Calling our enemies Jihadis and their movement a global Jihad unintentionally legitimises their actions.
The guide also bans the use of the word caliphate to describe Al Qaedas goal. The term has positive connotations for Muslims, says the guide, adding, The best description of what (Al Qaeda) really want to create is a global totalitarian state.
---------------------------------
Refresher from a year ago:
Janet Napolitano refuses to use the term "terrorist"
In my speech, although I did not use the word terrorism, I referred to man-caused disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur.
By the way, the other Bill Whittle PJTV shows on 1: National Security and 2: Iconography available here are also excellent. The one on security is astounding.
ISLAM.
Killer Cult.
Muslim Mass Murderers.
Anachronistic Savages.
If only 10% of islam is willing to kill given the opportunity, that's 140,000,000 of them.
ISLAM.
Killer Cult.
Muslim Mass Murderers.
Anachronistic Savages.
If only 10% of islam is willing to kill given the opportunity, that's 140,000,000 of them.
ISLAM.
Killer Cult.
Muslim Mass Murderers.
Anachronistic Savages.
If only 10% of islam is willing to kill given the opportunity, that's 140,000,000 of them.
ISLAM.
Killer Cult.
Muslim Mass Murderers.
Anachronistic Savages.
If only 10% of islam is willing to kill given the opportunity, that's 140,000,000 of them.
ISLAM.
Killer Cult.
Muslim Mass Murderers.
Anachronistic Savages.
If only 10% of islam is willing to kill given the opportunity, that's 140,000,000 of them.
ISLAM.
Killer Cult.
Muslim Mass Murderers.
Anachronistic Savages.
If only 10% of islam is willing to kill given the opportunity, that's 140,000,000 of them.
ISLAM.
Killer Cult.
Muslim Mass Murderers.
Anachronistic Savages.
If only 10% of islam is willing to kill given the opportunity, that's 140,000,000 of them.
ISLAM.
Killer Cult.
Muslim Mass Murderers.
Anachronistic Savages.
If only 10% of islam is willing to kill given the opportunity, that's 140,000,000 of them.
mooslim credo: I love you. I blow you and your children into bloody pieces.
The fact that the muslims themselves use the term in the worst possible way daily gives the use of the extremist definitions all the validity and legitimacy they deserve.
There's reality... and then there's Bullshit!*
Both the liar and the honest man must have regard for truth, the former to subvert it and the latter to propagate it. Bullshit, by contrast, is fundamentally unconcerned with truth or falsehood, but only with appearance, effect and persuasion, however transitory. Yuri Luzhkov was not accusing the Moscow weather forecasters of lying, or yet of trying to predict the weather and honestly failing; he was accusing them of not caring about the true weather. The essence of bullshit is getting away with it, with persuading listeners or readers of a sincerity that is, by definition, phoney. The bullshit artist simply does not care about truth: He pays no attention to it at all, writes Professor Frankfurt. By virtue of this, bullshit is a greater enemy of truth than lies are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.