To: SoCalPol
No sh*t, He flip flopped. I know more about Huck’s weak record than anyone here, since I was one to help expose it, long before Coulter got on that wagon (while fellating Mitt, I might add) Huck adopted Hunter’s position. As he should and to this day still supports. Once Again, How was flipper and McCain better?
177 posted on
04/16/2010 10:26:48 PM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
No sh*t, He flip flopped. I know more about Hucks weak record than anyone here, since I was one to help expose it, long before Coulter got on that wagon (while fellating Mitt, I might add) Huck adopted Hunters position. As he should and to this day still supports. Once Again, How was flipper and McCain better?
ANd you believe he is sincere?
Have you not been paying attention?
Paying attention to the calculated finger-in-the wind positions he has been taking even this year?
To: pissant
No sh*t, He flip flopped. I know more about Hucks weak record than anyone here, since I was one to help expose it, long before Coulter got on that wagon (while fellating Mitt, I might add) Huck adopted Hunters position. As he should and to this day still supports. Once Again, How was flipper and McCain better?
The point is, neither of the three, Mitt, Huckabee, or McCain are worth spit!
The real point of this whole discussion, is that Hunter made a calculated POLITICAL decision, not a principled decision, but a POLITICAL decision, because that is all he had left at that point.
The point is that purists and those with agendas do nothing to further conservatism.
Their out jousting at windmills and accomplish squat.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson