[Cringing Negativism Network]

“Now please explain to me why none of you have the courage to address Palin’s 2008 interview? “

-

I think it’s been explained to you that the 2008 interview was SCRIPTED by McCain campaign handlers. Who over-managed Palin’s every public move from day one.

Which is most likely, why McCain LOST.

No Palin interview as McCain’s running mate, was driven by Palin’s own views.

She was representing her boss. McCain at the time.

As a VP does.

So why are you repeating that? Get over it. And who do you think is the best candidate?

[Man50D]

I think it’s been explained to you that the 2008 interview was SCRIPTED by McCain campaign handlers. Who over-managed Palin’s every public move from day one.

You think wrong. That's the first time you Sarahbots have used that excuse. If what you say is true then why do all of you insist she supports a flaming socialist out of loyalty knowing McAmensty set her up?

No Palin interview as McCain’s running mate, was driven by Palin’s own views.

If that's true then why did you Sarahbots insist during the 2008 campaign she had enough influence to change McAmnesty's socialist tendencies.

She was representing her boss. McCain at the time.

That statement not only conflicts you Sarahbots claiming during the 2008 campaign she would influence McAmnesty to be more Conservative but confirms the point I made that during the 2008 campaign that Palin must acquiesce to McAmnesty's socialist tendencies as all Vice Presidents must relent to their bosses point of view. She knew the consequences going in as his VP and she still accepted.

So why are you repeating that? Get over it. And who do you think is the best candidate?

Why do all of you keep diverting attention from her by attacking anyone who does not agree with her by pointing out she is not as conservative as she appears?