Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Malek: Palin’s not doing what she needs to do to run
HOTAIR.COM ^ | 16 APRIL 2010 | ALLAHPUNDIT

Posted on 04/16/2010 5:28:52 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 621 next last
To: Cringing Negativism Network; Man50D
So there are my cards on the table.

Who do you think is the best candidate?


He won't answer you on this question and will avoid it at all costs because he knows if he does, it opens him up for crticism and possibly more exposure as a hypocrite!

In short, he is a coward!
141 posted on 04/16/2010 8:36:20 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Just trying to make the loon feel at home.


142 posted on 04/16/2010 8:37:26 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Let hot tar wash their throats and may it flow freely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

His post for the past several months have been the same over and over.
It is typical of a tool.
The word amnesty is a strawman for attacks on Sarah Paliln.

This is the same mentality I heard last evening at the Tea Party with several PaulBots, ranting on against the war, and all the 9/11 Truther propaganda.


143 posted on 04/16/2010 8:37:27 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
What is it with clowns like you and your projection?

Does that include anyone who doesn't agree Palin is the best thing since sliced bread?

You're behaving more and more like a progressive every day.

I thought I was a Paul supporter? Which is it?
144 posted on 04/16/2010 8:37:38 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
So far I haven't read why you Sarahbots won't directly address Palin supporting amnesty for illegals and why she supports a flaming socialists.

Then you are either dense, or just plain ignoring all the times it has been addressed.
145 posted on 04/16/2010 8:37:39 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya
Were you at my Tea Party rally last night???

There you go! Feel better?
146 posted on 04/16/2010 8:38:28 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
I thought I was a Paul supporter? Which is it?

Don't know, you'll have to address that question to the poster who accused you of that.

That was not me.
147 posted on 04/16/2010 8:38:33 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I think some of these posters like the hijacker must get off posting this crap


148 posted on 04/16/2010 8:40:35 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
He won't answer you on this question and will avoid it at all costs because he knows if he does, it opens him up for crticism and possibly more exposure as a hypocrite!

No more than you sarahbots won't answer why she supports amnesty for illegals and won;t let go of Juan McAmnesty.

In short, he is a coward!

Ouch! I guess you put me in my place! I take it all back. Sarah is wonderful!!! Now please explain to me why none of you have the courage to address Palin's 2008 interview?
149 posted on 04/16/2010 8:41:38 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Actaully, your questions have been asked and answered for about 2 months now...over, and over, and over.

You, however, have not once answered who you think is better right now.

So? You ya want to replace Obama?

150 posted on 04/16/2010 8:44:23 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (We need a Commander-in-Chief, not a professor of Law standing at the lectern-Palin 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

You ya want= Who ya want


151 posted on 04/16/2010 8:46:39 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (We need a Commander-in-Chief, not a professor of Law standing at the lectern-Palin 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“Now please explain to me why none of you have the courage to address Palin’s 2008 interview? “

-

I think it’s been explained to you that the 2008 interview was SCRIPTED by McCain campaign handlers. Who over-managed Palin’s every public move from day one.

Which is most likely, why McCain LOST.

No Palin interview as McCain’s running mate, was driven by Palin’s own views.

She was representing her boss. McCain at the time.

As a VP does.

So why are you repeating that? Get over it. And who do you think is the best candidate?


152 posted on 04/16/2010 8:46:59 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (2012: Repeal it all... All of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya; Man50D

153 posted on 04/16/2010 8:49:32 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Like I said a few mins ago , posters like the hijacker
get off with their posts.


154 posted on 04/16/2010 8:53:00 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

It is the same mind set we heard last night.
Their mind never got beyond 8 years old.


155 posted on 04/16/2010 8:54:37 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Man50D
Just....wow.....

The ol' Huckster.

Nah, I won't believe it until Man says so himself!

What say you, Man?

156 posted on 04/16/2010 8:54:58 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (We need a Commander-in-Chief, not a professor of Law standing at the lectern-Palin 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

157 posted on 04/16/2010 9:00:30 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Hmmmm, he’s gone. Guess he didn’t want to defend his candidate.


158 posted on 04/16/2010 9:01:10 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (We need a Commander-in-Chief, not a professor of Law standing at the lectern-Palin 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

lol, great post!


159 posted on 04/16/2010 9:01:52 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya; Man50D
Look at his tagline. Now follow the LINK. See the happy Huckster face on the bottom left? LOL.
160 posted on 04/16/2010 9:02:33 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 621 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson