No-- the statement about tilting at windmills was made about the eligibility claim, which the court dismissed. The statement about no jurisdiction was made about Orly's request that she be allowed to join the suit challenging the health care act, which the court couldn't rule on because that suit is pending in Florida.
Doesn't matter. Don't you think that is very odd...and somewhat biased...language to be issued from the bench in an official ruling on a defendant's motion?