Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: browardchad

“No it’s abolutely clear that Taitz is an incompetent attorney.”
__

She’s unquestionably an incompetent attorney. But all the other eligibility attorneys have gotten similar results, so maybe they’re all incompetent ... which kinda makes you wonder why no competent attorneys would touch these cases.


20 posted on 04/16/2010 12:57:53 PM PDT by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: BigGuy22

“. . .which kinda makes you wonder why no competent attorneys would touch these cases.”

It should make people wonder. Lacking either a factual or legal basis for a suit is a good place to begin.

parsy, who doesn’t wonder


24 posted on 04/16/2010 1:04:34 PM PDT by parsifal (Woe to those who foster stupidity for their own sake, for they shall be drawn and quartered - WEIG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: BigGuy22
which kinda makes you wonder why no competent attorneys would touch these cases.

Because they know enough law to know that the Courts won't decide a President's eligibility, which is an issue for the Electoral Collega and the Congress.

34 posted on 04/16/2010 2:29:33 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson