I’ll bite... so it’s moral to say that someone should receive higher endorsement money based on the feeling that they are a “good guy” and that the other guy is a “bad guy” and not based on his potential to actually earn more money for the sponsors?
I’m assuming that this is all “Tiger related”, and my point is if that the sponsors can make money with Tiger, then they shouldn’t consider his morals, anymore than a record company should worry about what a rap star spews on the air or how he lives his personal life. Morals have no place in the economic equation. If there’s money to be made, then make it.